
At the beginning of the summer, the Mexican Senate adopted significant amendments to the national anti-money laundering law. At the center of these innovations were gambling, valuable assets, and other financial transactions traditionally considered high-risk.
The country faces international pressure
In recent years, international organizations have been demanding that countries increase the transparency of their financial sectors and intensify efforts to combat the movement of illegal capital. This is partly the reason for the haste shown by the Mexican authorities. The country is expecting a large-scale inspection by the FATF—an international group of countries that develops standard anti-crime practices for financial markets and evaluates their implementation. Experts’ opinions are based on long-standing experience: non-compliance with FATF recommendations can result in sanctions, difficulties with international money transfers, and a decline in attractiveness for foreign investors. Similar situations have previously arisen in Brazil, where tighter controls increased market transparency but provoked protests from some members of the business community.
New rules for the gambling market and high-value transactions
Among the key points of the Mexican law is the recognition of certain economic operations as “vulnerable” to the movement of illegal funds. The document includes areas such as sports betting, lotteries, as well as the purchase and sale of high-value goods—for example, jewelry and antiques.
Companies operating in these sectors are required to tighten internal control procedures and increase the volume of reporting to government bodies. Under the new rules, all transactions above a certain amount are subject to mandatory monitoring and a more detailed verification of the source of funds.
Violators of the law risk losing their licenses and also face substantial fines. This is already grounds for significant changes within businesses operating in the entertainment industry and in the buying and selling of valuable items. According to estimates by the National Institute of Statistics and Geography, the total value of all transactions covered by the new regulatory framework exceeds $2.5 billion annually. The new requirements are aimed at a structural transformation of the entire market, making transparency a key objective for every participant.
New powers for financial authorities
With the expansion of the legislative framework, the role of supervisory bodies has changed significantly. The Mexican Financial Intelligence Unit (UIF), together with the Ministry of Finance, has gained the ability to analyze companies’ financial flows without the need to go through lengthy bureaucratic procedures or request a court order to access information. Emphasizing the importance of such changes, supporters of the reform point to growing international interest and an increase in schemes for the illegal transfer of funds from the real sector to offshore accounts.
Senator Javier Corral (Morena party) noted: “Allowing criminals to use formally legal mechanisms in the gaming industry means undermining confidence in our economy.” This viewpoint is widely shared among investors concerned about potential reputational risks. The main declared advantages are:
- Increased transparency of financial flows
- Reduced opportunities for the legalization of criminal groups’ proceeds
- Improved investment image of the country
- More effective registration of suspicious transactions at an early stage
Criticism and concerns
Not everyone has welcomed the new initiative. Opposition senators and representatives of small business see in the reform risks of excessive control over operations, increased administrative burden on small companies, and the threat of an expanding shadow sector. In North American countries, there are already many “grey” casinos in operation. Many of them are large international brands with good reputations. According to www.twinspinca.com, a similar situation is observed in Canada. Among the most popular online casinos in the country, many operate unofficially—as in the United States. Many of these companies would be happy to work officially, but are unable to do so due to complex legislation. Many experts believe that Mexico should not follow the path of further regulatory complication.
Criticism especially intensified after the publication of a provision allowing supervisory bodies to obtain data without judicial authorization. The legal community warns that such a measure could violate basic privacy rights and jeopardize the security of personal information.
Associations of gambling operators point out that small companies will struggle to cope with the increased reporting requirements. According to several experts, there is a possibility that stepped-up monitoring of financial flows may push businesses further into the informal sector—the very outcome reformers feared most.
Protecting the economy or new controls?
When such measures are introduced, the question always arises: do they facilitate the fight against money laundering or merely lead to new administrative restrictions? Among foreign experts, the opinion is widespread that a step toward greater transparency will attract large investors to the market. This will make the gambling sector less suspect and demonstrate Mexico’s readiness to cooperate with the international community. At the same time, the upcoming FATF evaluation will be a crucial test—a positive recommendation will allow Mexico to enjoy greater freedom for financial operations, while failure could mean the need to revise its strategy.




